Daniel B. Garrie · Special Master & Forensic Neutral

Discovery is where cases stall. Resolve the fight in weeks, not motion cycles.

A working library on how discovery and ESI disputes actually get resolved — the rules, the protocols, and the neutrals who move them. Grounded in primary authority, written for the litigators in the fight.

Special Master

In re Facebook Consumer Privacy Litigation. Appointed, N.D. Cal.

Discovery Referee

Dozens of appointments. L.A. Superior Court and courts in WA, NY, IL, FL, NV.

Law & Technology

20+ years at the law–technology seam. 400+ publications. Harvard faculty.

His report was a model of clarity — even to a lay person — and demonstrated how extremely conscientious and thorough he had been. The report was directly responsible for the prompt settlement not only of the case before me, but seven other disputes between the parties.
— The judge who appointed Mr. Garrie as Special Master on a complex dispute

The six fights

Most discovery stalls come down to six recurring disputes.

When a case turns on how the technology actually works, the motion calendar is the slow path. Here's what a technically fluent neutral resolves — and what we write about.

01

ESI protocol fights

Format, scope, custodians, and metadata disputes that keep production from starting.

02

Spoliation allegations

Servers, mobile devices, and cloud accounts said to be lost or altered under FRCP 37(e).

03

TAR & search-term disputes

Disagreements over predictive coding, validation, and search-term protocols.

04

Privilege review disputes

Volume, methodology, and clawback fights — and the Rule 502(d) orders that solve them.

05

Forensic inspection battles

Protocols governing access to and imaging of an opposing party's systems.

06

Cross-border discovery

U.S. obligations against GDPR and Hague-Convention limits on moving data.

About the neutral

This library is maintained by Daniel B. Garrie — a jurist who speaks both languages: the rules of discovery and the systems the evidence lives on.

Over 20+ years, Daniel has been appointed by and appeared before state and federal courts nationwide, including the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the Second, Third, and Seventh Circuits. He teaches at Harvard and serves as a neutral through JAMS.

Admitted in Washington & New York Fellow, Academy of Court Appointed Neutrals Harvard faculty
Daniel B. Garrie, Esq.

Credentials

Twenty years where the law and the technology meet.

400+

Publications, cited across articles, briefs, and judicial opinions.

Harvard

Faculty teaching cybersecurity, computer forensics, and smart contracts.

JAMS

Neutral for discovery, ESI, and forensic disputes nationwide.

4

U.S. cybersecurity patents; co-author of a Federal Judicial Center guide for judges.

Considering a neutral?

Discuss a potential appointment.

Tell us a little about the dispute. A JAMS Case Manager can discuss whether a Special Master, discovery referee, or forensic neutral fits your matter — and the procedural path to appointment.

Engagement is administered exclusively through JAMS. This form is a preliminary inquiry only; it is not a request for legal advice and does not create any engagement. Formal appointment proceeds through the JAMS Case Manager.

New to discovery neutrals? Read the FAQ →

Fields marked are required.

We typically respond within one business day. For administrative scheduling, contact the JAMS Case Manager directly.

Start with the free pack. Route the engagement when you're ready.

Download the Model Discovery Order Pack today. When a matter needs a neutral, engagement is administered through JAMS.