Special Master · Discovery Referee · Forensic Neutral

Discovery disputes are the most expensive fights in litigation. Resolve them in weeks, not motion cycles.

Daniel B. Garrie is a discovery special master and eDiscovery neutral — a technically fluent jurist appointed by state and federal courts nationwide to resolve discovery and ESI disputes. He is as comfortable with engineers and developers as with lawyers and judges.

Special Master

In re Facebook, Inc. Consumer Privacy User Profile Litigation. Appointed by Judge Chhabria, N.D. Cal.

Discovery Referee

Dozens of appointments. L.A. Superior Court and courts in WA, NY, IL, FL, NV, and elsewhere.

Law & Technology

20+ years at the intersection of law and technology. 400+ publications. Harvard faculty.

His report was a model of clarity — even to a lay person — and demonstrated how extremely conscientious and thorough he had been. The report was directly responsible for the prompt settlement not only of the case immediately before me, but also seven other disputes between the parties.
— The judge who appointed Mr. Garrie as Special Master on a complex dispute

Who this is for

For litigation counsel who would rather resolve the discovery fight than brief it for six months.

If your case has stalled on a discovery question that turns on how the technology actually works, a neutral who understands both the rules and the systems can move it faster than a motion calendar can.

01

ESI protocol fights

Format, scope, custodians, and metadata disputes that keep production from starting.

02

Spoliation allegations

Servers, mobile devices, cloud accounts, and biometric timekeeping data said to be lost or altered.

03

TAR and search-term disputes

Disagreements over predictive coding, validation, and search-term protocols.

04

Privilege review disputes

Volume, methodology, and claw-back fights that bog down a production.

05

Forensic inspection battles

Protocols governing access to and imaging of an opposing party's systems.

06

AI and algorithm discovery

Disputes over models, training data, and algorithmic systems as discoverable evidence.

Meet the neutral

A jurist who speaks both languages: the rules of discovery and the systems the evidence lives on.

Over more than 20 years, Daniel has been appointed and appeared before the Los Angeles County Superior Court, the New York Supreme Court, the Delaware Supreme Court, and the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the Second, Third, and Seventh Circuits. He teaches cybersecurity, computer forensics, and smart contracts at Harvard, and founded the consulting firm Law & Forensics in 2008.

Admitted in Washington & New York Fellow, Academy of Court Appointed Neutrals Four U.S. cybersecurity patents
Daniel B. Garrie introduction video
Watch · JAMS introduction

Credentials

Twenty years where the law and the technology meet.

400+

Publications, cited across 500+ articles, briefs, and judicial opinions.

Harvard

Faculty teaching cybersecurity, computer forensics, and smart contracts.

JAMS AI

Co-creator of the JAMS AI Dispute Resolution Rules.

4

U.S. cybersecurity patents, and co-author of the Federal Judicial Center guide for judges.

Start a conversation

Discuss a potential appointment.

Tell us a little about the dispute. A JAMS Case Manager can discuss whether a Special Master, discovery referee, or forensic neutral fits your matter — and the procedural path to appointment.

Engagement is administered exclusively through JAMS. This form is a preliminary inquiry only; it is not a request for legal advice and does not create any engagement. Formal appointment proceeds through the JAMS Case Manager.

We typically respond within one business day. For administrative scheduling, contact the JAMS Case Manager directly.

Name the neutral, then route the engagement.

Stipulate to or request Daniel Garrie by name. Engagement is administered through JAMS.